Why Do Chocolate Truffles Cost So Much

Forca Italy

I do not know if it makes me more horror the murderess Sarah Scazzi or right-thinking people who wake up everyday driven by indifference and become bloodthirsty forcaioli. There are many people who have the misfortune to die in spectacular fashion. But others have the misfortune to become prey of hyenas of newspapers and television stations, bars and offices. Poor Sarah Scazzi is an opportunity for a good journalist to make a scoop and the city to rediscover the healthy indignation that makes you feel at peace with your conscience. He says, "because he chooses and no deaths at work?"
In fact we propose the telenovela or liquidino the news of a death at work in a day, does not change much. In both cases, ultimately the means of "information" they have said absolutely nothing useful to try to understand, analyze, and maybe change a society that raises the dead.

First, one wonders why this case "makes news" (and thus arouses indignation) and many others do not. But the effect would be to say banal. Maybe it's more interesting to ask whether there is a connection between the fact that some things are news and the fact that outraged some things and not for others. It is indignant that we end up on command?
And many are asking why insist on the details of the murder with morbid desecration? It will be because people read them. And maybe we taste test. In the box "most read" corriere.it of these titles appear in order of most read:
1. "I have killed her after raping Sarah '
2. The mother hears the news petrified on live TV;
3. Training more paid sex mound to the San Siro;
4. Sarah was killed, his uncle, who confessed the corpse buried in the countryside;
5. Threats to Marcegaglia, searched the premises the daily newspaper "Il Giornale"

Some critics of the cynicism of "Chi l'ha visto?" which broke the news live in front of the mother. The paradox is that the cynicism of "Chi l'ha visto?" is the second most read news corriere.it. It will be the charm of the filth, but apparently people like to read the mother's live TV, transfixed by pain and what are those bastards in the Tv
It 's a good example of performance information. Today, the Ansa news agency securities with the statements made by a family that Assassin said: "Tom has to pay. It 'obvious that he must pay. The law provides for. Where's the news? There. And 'information-show. "This really has to pay is a Comment anywhere from older sports bar. And why not "They should put them all in a row and take a machine gun"? Why people does not provide that the penalties are punitive, but re-education. It will be a feel-good approach too, but in the seventies probably saw it as a breakthrough for a company out of a piece from the Middle Ages.
If the TV do the competition to see who gives the news first (at the cost of the mother shot in the face of live), the newspapers make up for the competition of television and the web with morbid details: raped her when she was alive or dead ? Where? How? Qu went? How many times? How long after she was dead? Details repugnant, which (who knows why) attract attention. To fill the space throws in the usual series of clichés: the agony of the mother, which close relatives in the reserve, people screaming to the gallows, the community that says, "so it seemed a good person, not the ' We never thought ", etc.. etc..
The spectacle of the pain makes audiences and journalists hyenas nourish and encourage the public morbidity. Then wash both the public consciousness yelling delusions forcaioli against criminals: "They should put them in jail and throw away the key." So the problem is solved, at least until the next murder.
You should instead ask a series of questions. The first is: there had been told that crime was rampant for roads, particularly by illegal immigrants bent on killing and raping in freedom? Not that the streets in the middle of the immigrants are more relaxed than in our own homes, where an uncle may harass, kill and rape his niece and no one has hints of his madness?
And the second question is: maybe it is more difficult and tiring, but it would certainly be more helpful to think about how to prevent crimes, rather than wasting time on unnecessary chatter to what the punishment should be cruel to punish them without the least this solves the problem ?