They talk about the future of the Delta Park for two decades now abundant . You think that it should not be hard to imagine the future of a park that can not bind to nature, beautiful scenery, tourism, local products. All things, to talk, they are part the good intentions of all, when we talk about the subject.
In fact, however, things are different. E 'singular, for example, that in the park of our local administrators Delta allow hunters to slaughter of animals every year. Recently have approved the conversion of old coal-fired power plant Polesine Camerini, and not enough, have allowed the establishment of a huge LNG terminal, a monster as tall as a building of Boccasette bathers can enjoy in all its ugliness and expropriation of the local fishermen several miles of water. In Porto Viro is preparing to expand the industrial zone, which could become a new Marghera Polesine. Meanwhile, administrators push well as a platform for offshore goods Pharaonic, costly and again impacting the ecosystem and the landscape of the park. All things that are at odds with the much-vaunted beauty of the landscape and environmental protection and local production. There was also a director of a local municipality of Delta, which proposed visits to the Delta by helicopter. Not to mention projects, thankfully dead on paper, as Euroworld or the "highway of clams," delusions that demonstrate the best total lack of awareness of what are the resources of the Delta. There is a strange squint
plus: on the one hand, it glorifies the beauty of the Delta, on the other hand you want to settlements of all kinds to promote local economic development. Not by the merits of the environmental impact of a coal (which of course I could be refuted immediately by the data in favor of the optimists in the project), but that the central Polesine Camerini is a real crap to be presented to the tourist who arrives in search majestic landscapes, should be self-evident: so much so that even in the slides projected at a meeting of Confindustria a few years ago, among the many charming views of lagoons, shoals and sandbanks there was not one that was present our beloved Central, although its magnitude is clearly visible from all parts of the island of the Maiden.
Talk "who bet on the economy of the Park," however, was a breath of fresh air. While gossip for decades and is drowning in the contradictions mentioned above, some have already found the right formula and would simply need the institutions did their part. I remember my interview with Maria Adelaide then Avanzo Tenuta Ca 'Zen, a bed and breakfast housed in a villa in Eighteenth-Century Taglio di Po
is the first good example. While the Park Authority has had the brilliant idea of \u200b\u200bbuilding from scratch an ultra-modern visitors' center in Porto Viro, someone thought it was smarter to take advantage of a historic building to create a structure in harmony with the scenic beauty, which should be our tourist attraction. In Camargue, told me the Avanzo, we speak of "local culture" if we sell to the tourists a landscape, we must respect the environment, local cultures, distinctive architecture, etc.. Instead we are rotting rural buildings, while building wildly modern buildings of rare ugliness.
Another thing that made "those who bet on the Park" is to network service offerings. It is true that in the Delta, there is nothing to be done. It is, rather, to link and coordinate the many other opportunities. And 'course, I said the surplus, if one is in the Delta and is left in disarray, two days after he leaves. From here the trivial idea to offer the visiting wildlife, the boat trip, cycle routes and all things you can do in the Delta. That is what makes any cottage or bed and breakfast worthy of the name in an area of \u200b\u200bItaly where it is believed in tourism. Of course, if instead of building bicycle paths, we think the road of the clams are fresh.
just to be in terms of paths, impossible not to mention an anecdote dnell'autunno 2008, when the town council of Porto Viro (from which the current president of the Park) decided to close one lane to allow hunters to shoot in the border lands, that "in order to maintain a peaceful coexistence and support equally the most common rights of citizens hunters, cyclists and birdwatchers practitioners, enabling early the exercise of its business in the very valuable land adjacent to the lane without limitations and restrictions of land and others to use them safely when the hunt is closed. "It speaks for itself.
A breath of fresh air, I said, talk to people that the future of the Delta has clear ideas. In these people, who after all would just think about their own interests, I found a vision of how it should be clear and precise Delta Park. After all, the survival of their business just depends on the survival of the Delta and this is the most common principle behind all production activities related to the "territory". But just who decides the future of Delta does not have an idea of \u200b\u200bthe future, chases and monstrous projects in contradiction with the development of the park, with logical reasoning of the chair. Or more likely to respond to other political and economic interests.
